The Topic: Engaging with Negative (and Good) Online Behavior
How we define what’s “good” and “bad" behavior and how we might develop a more nuanced understanding of it.
This week's (03/08/16) chat moderated by Meredith Gould (@meredithgould)
Topics:
T1: Without detailing the spew, have you ever been attacked online?
T1a: What has typically been your response: mute/block/report/engage?
T2: What distinguishes “hate speech” from “trolling” behavior?
T3: What distinguishes trolling behavior from “bad manners”?
T3a: What might become possible by embracing a more nuanced understanding?
T4: What would be a ministry-based response to bad behavior online?
TBonus: What can and will YOU do to enhance civil discourse online?
T1a: What has typically been your response: mute/block/report/engage?
T2: What distinguishes “hate speech” from “trolling” behavior?
T3: What distinguishes trolling behavior from “bad manners”?
T3a: What might become possible by embracing a more nuanced understanding?
T4: What would be a ministry-based response to bad behavior online?
TBonus: What can and will YOU do to enhance civil discourse online?
Read the transcript on Storify
No comments:
Post a Comment